The new mega mall, called The Mall of Tomorrow, is slated to open next year in the heart of downtown Dallas.
It will be built on land once owned by the U.S. military, and will boast a combined 1.6 million square feet of retail space, including a hotel, spa, shopping mall and restaurant.
But for now, it’s just a giant online mall.
The mall is the brainchild of Texas-based investment firm KPMG, and it’s based in Austin, Texas.
In July, KPMB hired veteran investment strategist Paul O’Brien to manage the project, a move that was seen as an attempt to distance itself from the former Texas Army National Guard outpost.
KPMP said it was aiming to complete the $3 billion project by 2025.
The company announced the mall’s official opening on July 21, and the first big crowds started to arrive in late August.
But by late October, it was becoming apparent that the project was going to be a massive bust.
By the end of November, K PMG had spent $2.2 billion to get its project off the ground, according to its annual report.
K PMB’s project is expected to be the biggest online mall in the world.
In the report, K, which also owns the mall, described how it had built the project using borrowed money.
It said the money was borrowed by KPMI from the federal government to help pay for the construction of the mall and related infrastructure.
K’s management team, KCM Partners, had a history of working with other financial institutions.
It had invested in the online shopping mall in Shanghai, where the company was based, and in a real estate development in Singapore, which KPMBs parent company, KKR, was based in.
KCM’s deal with KPM Group was one of the largest in the history of online shopping malls.
But the report also noted that KPMT was involved in other online shopping projects in other cities, including in New York City and Shanghai.
By early November, the mall was looking like a disaster.
In its first full month, The Mall fell short of its initial $3.3 billion goal, falling $5.6 billion short of the $5 billion it was supposed to receive.
KMA News reporter David Molnar said the mall had fallen far short of what KPMF had hoped for, with more than two-thirds of its total budget missing.
By December, The Malls financials were a mess.
The report described the project as having a $1 billion shortfall in revenue.
That meant KPMK was now facing a $6.5 billion shortfall.
The shortfall in revenues meant that KMA could no longer finance the project.
KMM had spent more than $1.8 billion in its own funds to finance the mall.
KSM had spent about $4.3 million.
By that time, KMA had spent almost $3 million to fund the project through debt.
The mall was a failure.
KAM has a reputation for being tough on debt, and KPMW had taken a similar approach to the mall project.
“KPMG did a great job, in terms of leveraging their resources to make sure that this project was funded,” Molner said.
But KPMU had also spent much of its own money on the project and had borrowed from several banks, including the Federal Reserve, which was one reason why it had to repay some of the debt.
“It’s just the kind of thing that KAM’s reputation for debt is really high,” Meren said.
Meren also said the project could have been far more successful had it focused on a broader business focus.
“In a way, the project would have benefited from being able to focus more on what KMA is doing for the shopping experience and the business environment,” Maren said.
The KPMO report also highlighted a major problem with KSM’s investment in The Mall.
According to KPME, the company’s portfolio included several retail properties.
In addition to The Mall, KSM also owns a shopping center in San Francisco, and a luxury hotel in Los Angeles.
KMS has about 40 retail properties, including hotels, shopping centers, and restaurants, all of which are owned by KMA.
KWM owns a number of hotels, including some in Las Vegas.
The real estate company had invested $1 million in The mall and was expected to use the money to develop a new retail center on the site.
But because KPMA was not involved in the project at the time, it didn’t have a say in the future of the property, according a report in the Los Angeles Times.
K AM also did not have an involvement in the development of The Mall and was only aware of the project when the company bought a stake in it, K AM said in its 2014 financial report.
“I do not know